Despite the agent’s rage, an IR35 appeal against HMRC’s view that a tennis commentator should be regarded as an employee of the broadcaster, was denied because it was late.
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Qualified professional advisers are a good thing because they know exactly what to do when a client’s tax position turns sour. Well, that’s the theory. Recent cases heard by the first tier tribunal (FTT) suggest that this may not always be the case.
The limited liability partnership (LLP) was established in 2009 and acted as an intermediary, supplying the services of Barry Cowan as a tennis commentator to Sky UK Ltd.
HMRC – after seeking information from Sky – took the view that “the arrangements between [the LLP] and Sky are such that had they take (sic) the form of a contract between Mr Cowan and Sky, Mr Cowan would be regarded as employed by Sky such that additional income tax and class 1 national insurance contributions are due.”
Determinations (regulation 80, Pay as You Earn Regulations) and notices (section 8, Social Security and Contributions (Transfer of Functions) Act 1999) to collect this tax and national insurance contributions (NIC) were issued to the LLP for the years 2014/15 to 2018/19.
Register for free to continue reading
It’s 100% free and provides unlimited access to the latest accounting news, advice and insight every day. As well as access to this exclusive article, you can: