Share this content
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Broken tennis racket | accountingweb | IR35 appeal denied as late
iStock_elkhophoto_broken_racket

Combative agent no match for statutory legislation

by

Despite the agent’s rage, an IR35 appeal against HMRC’s view that a tennis commentator should be regarded as an employee of the broadcaster, was denied because it was late.

5th May 2023
Share this content
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

Qualified professional advisers are a good thing because they know exactly what to do when a client’s tax position turns sour. Well, that’s the theory. Recent cases heard by the first tier tribunal (FTT) suggest that this may not always be the case.

The case of Cranham Sports LLP (TC08794) is one such.

Sporting chance

The limited liability partnership (LLP) was established in 2009 and acted as an intermediary, supplying the services of Barry Cowan as a tennis commentator to Sky UK Ltd. 

HMRC – after seeking information from Sky – took the view that “the arrangements between [the LLP] and Sky are such that had they take (sic) the form of a contract between Mr Cowan and Sky, Mr Cowan would be regarded as employed by Sky such that additional income tax and class 1 national insurance contributions are due.” 

Determinations (regulation 80, Pay as You Earn Regulations) and notices (section 8, Social Security and Contributions (Transfer of Functions) Act 1999) to collect this tax and national insurance contributions (NIC) were issued to the LLP for the years 2014/15 to 2018/19.

Register for free to continue reading

It’s 100% free and provides unlimited access to the latest accounting news, advice and insight every day. As well as access to this exclusive article, you can:


Content lock down, tick icon

View all AccountingWEB content


Content lock down, tick icon

Comment on articles


Content lock down, tick icon

Watch our digital shows and more

Access content now

Already have an account?

Replies (1)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By Justin Bryant
05th May 2023 12:41

Yes, as I said here, brusqueness will not get you anywhere with HMRC (quite the opposite).
https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/damning-late-pta-refusal-vat...

And it certainly did not impress the judge.

Thanks (0)